oversoul53 Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Read all about it: SDCC: Marvel Studios, Whedon Announce "Avengers: Age of Ultron" - Comic Book Resources More of Marvel at Comic Con 2013: Liveblog: Marvel Studio's Comic-Con Panel For 2013 - Bleeding Cool Comic Book, Movies and TV News and Rumors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryukori Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 I can't wait for this! I see that they're going to release it after Thor 2, Captain America 2, and The Incredible Hulk 2. 2015 is a long way from now, but at least these three movies will keep me happy until then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeHellsing Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Utron huh? Not a bad choice for a villain I must say to bring in next. Granted, I haven't seen Iron Man 3 yet (it's out on DVD next month here in NZ, and I missed seeing it in cinemas)... but I understand that Iron Man 3, the next Thor movie and the next Captain America movie (I think they were making one, not sure) all again, tie into the next Avengers movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oversoul53 Posted July 21, 2013 Author Share Posted July 21, 2013 I can't wait for this! I see that they're going to release it after Thor 2, Captain America 2, and The Incredible Hulk 2. 2015 is a long way from now, but at least these three movies will keep me happy until then. No ‘Incredible Hulk 2′ Until After ‘The Avengers 2′ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfree7 Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Will be interested to see if it can top the $1.2 Billion the first one made. Looking forward to this one for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanH Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 *Squeals /10charactersminimum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AegisAvenger Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Did someone say Age of Ultron? http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130213040204/marveldatabase/images/d/d1/Age_of_Ultron_Vol_1_1_Midtown_Comics_Variant.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunBallad Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Did someone say Age of Ultron? http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130213040204/marveldatabase/images/d/d1/Age_of_Ultron_Vol_1_1_Midtown_Comics_Variant.jpg Ultron is a beast, I hope they do him justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowEpyon10 Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Yeah I heard that comic story arc wasn't very good and despite the fact it had Ultron in the title he barely appeared in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronnierighteye Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Wait, what about Thanos!? Unless they're holding out for some sort of ridiculous nerd-out secret wars type deal once marvel finds a way to get all their licenses back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AegisAvenger Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Wait, what about Thanos!? Unless they're holding out for some sort of ridiculous nerd-out secret wars type deal once marvel finds a way to get all their licenses back. Its believed he will make a appearance in Guardians of the Galaxy and be the main villain in Avengers 3. Make sense because having someone as powerful as Thanos for the 2nd movie and then having a villain not as powerful as him for Avengers 3, will be anti-climatic. Especially when they don't have access to Dr. Doom, Galactus or any X-Men villains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dz06lt Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 They had to get downy jr on board before the official announcement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totoyeahwhat Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Will be interested to see if it can top the $1.2 Billion the first one made. Looking forward to this one for sure. 1.5 "billion" On topic, I will watch this no doubt! Some of the best movies around! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnyg Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Superhero movies are just as overused as zombie films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanH Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Wait, what about Thanos!? Unless they're holding out for some sort of ridiculous nerd-out secret wars type deal once marvel finds a way to get all their licenses back. He'll show up in Guardians of the Galaxy: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=83817 Superhero movies are just as overused as zombie films. Not at all. You can have a lot of adventures with superheroes. Zombies theme just goes nowhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottimusPrime00 Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 So apparently Ultrons origins will be different to the comics and won't involve Pym. Comic-Con: Whedon Says No Hank Pym in Avengers 2 and Different Ultron Origin - IGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunBallad Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Its believed he will make a appearance in Guardians of the Galaxy and be the main villain in Avengers 3. Make sense because having someone as powerful as Thanos for the 2nd movie and then having a villain not as powerful as him for Avengers 3, will be anti-climatic. Especially when they don't have access to Dr. Doom, Galactus or any X-Men villains. What, why don't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akumatron Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Well, Fox hold the X-Men license, so that would be why they can't use them....as for the others, I don't know. Maybe the same issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronnierighteye Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 What, why don't they? Marvel was still an independently traded company when they first started getting into the movies. As such they didn't have the resources required to produce the films themselves like they do now with Disney backing them, so they sold licenses to their intellectual properties to different studios to make the movies. That why we have the latest spider-man reboot and x-men last stand and wolverine movies as of late. Marvel wants to get the licenses back but as long as studios are producing movies based on those properties they get to hold the licenses. As it stands marvel studios can't even mention the word 'mutant' in their movies or else fox could sue them over breach of contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunBallad Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Marvel was still an independently traded company when they first started getting into the movies. As such they didn't have the resources required to produce the films themselves like they do now with Disney backing them, so they sold licenses to their intellectual properties to different studios to make the movies. That why we have the latest spider-man reboot and x-men last stand and wolverine movies as of late. Marvel wants to get the licenses back but as long as studios are producing movies based on those properties they get to hold the licenses. As it stands marvel studios can't even mention the word 'mutant' in their movies or else fox could sue them over breach of contract. I forgot that Marvel is owned by Disney now, it is retarded that they can't use their own trade marks even though they are licensed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HloodyBell Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Whoe - Looking forward to This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 (edited) Yes sir! I can't wait for this! I was never expecting Ultron...but he's a welcome swerve. A part of me wants Marvel to get their licenses back so that The Avengers can be done some true justice by having...well...whoever the hell Joss Whedon wants to put on the team...now last I heard they were in talks with Sony about using Spider-Man (and Andrew Garfield) in Avengers 2, so that'll be awesome if that happens. And to whoever said Super Hero movies are as over used as Zombies is crazy. 9 times out of 10 the Super Hero movies are the most exciting movies of the year. X-Men started a revolution in movies in 2000 and it's been one hell of a ride these past 13 years. Edited July 22, 2013 by TheViper4Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnyg Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 And to whoever said Super Hero movies are as over used as Zombies is crazy. 9 times out of 10 the Super Hero movies are the most exciting movies of the year. X-Men started a revolution in movies in 2000 and it's been one hell of a ride these past 13 years. Well. First of all I'm crazy. And secondly I've never been a fan of superhero movies. It's batman I like, but everything else ain't my cake. It will of course bias my views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oversoul53 Posted July 22, 2013 Author Share Posted July 22, 2013 I've never been a fan of superhero movies. then why are you even in this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnyg Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 then why are you even in this thread? I wrote my opinion. Problem with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now