james123193 Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 The line one of the makers of the next Call of Duty uses about the series is that these games are movies we can play. This one will be a war thriller that hides a mystery. A few weeks ago in New York, Josh Olin, community manager fort team creating November's Call of Duty Black Ops showed me the game's Victor Charlie level and did his best to be cagey about the game's campaign. With Gamescom started in Germany, I'm now permitted by the game's creators to tell you what I saw, though I'd like to focus on the mysteriousness of the whole thing. There was some stuff that Olin showed me, that I could see and believe because it was in front of me. And then there was the stuff about which he was coy. In the confirmed category: The Victor Charlie occurs after your helicopter is shot down in or near Vietnam in the late 1960s. In Black Ops you are playing as elite cold war soldier (or soliders; it's unclear if you play as different protagonists.) Gunfire zips into your chopper. You get out and are in a jungle gunfight. Olin's got some skills, so he aimed for a killshot... cue a new effect, the game's camera hitching a ride on the bullet from his in-game rifle and, in slow-mo, into the enemy. That's the moment that prompted Olin to use that "movie you can play" line. Black Ops runs on the visually impressive tech that has powered recent Modern Warfare and Call of Duty games, so the jungle battle Olin showed me looked terrific. Combat moved to some thatched-roof buildings, where many explosions were caused. I noticed that the game didn't include the signature yellow-star compass display that traditionally has pointed the player to their next goal in the series' more-or-less linear campaigns. Olin said that system didn't suit Black Ops, which is, more than other CoDs, a game about being part of a team. Instead of the star, I saw text on the screen doling out simple mission orders such as "clear area" or "follow" (the latter of which was pinned to an ally soldier). Olin transitioned into a tunnel sequence that had been shown briefly at E3 in June. His character crept through the darkened underground, making shadows flicker with a flashlight, sneaking up on some enemies for the kill. In the cagey category: The tunnel sequence, for some reason, made me think of how emotionally dark Treyarch's previous Call of Duty, 2008's World at War was. That game's campaign began with your American character facing torture at the hands of Japanese fighters in World War II and, in rare memorable instances, tested the player's moral compass. In one late level in Germany, for example, the player had the choice whether to slaughter German soldiers who had surrendered or to leave them captured. Olin would not confirm that Treyarch is doing more of that dark player-testing stuff. At my mention of moral choices, he became cagey, promising that the single-player campaign will reward players who go through it, that pieces that may feel disconnected will click at its conclusion. He expects gamers to have an "oh wow" epiphany by the time they finish the game. Naturally, he wasn't going to say what it is. He said we shouldn't expect Treyarch to divulge much more and that it is is important to Treyarch that single-player gamers have a "gripping" experience. That's also part of the reason, he explained, that the new game's campaign is single-player only. (Co-op is a separate mode, supporting two players on the same system or four players online.) This is not the standard way a solo campaign in a Call of Duty is described, but it seems fitting in a game about Black Ops. The solo campaign look like's it is going to hold it's own in this CoD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kennus Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 haha not to be an ass or anything but as useual most people will skip the campaign all together, straight to MP. or at least the people i play with and alot of people iv talked to online say the never touched the single of mw2. so far not a single duty has a a story worth caring about IMO including the realish ones yawn to history. thats not to say im not going to play single i love trophies ill prob just skip storyline when i can and ignore what the npcs say. i never even knew there were moral choices in WaW you could let the soldies at subway entrance live is news to me i think... anyway maybe some1 should post a poll asking how many people actually listen to storyline of cod games. side not the crawling through tunnels part looked like might make ya jump a lil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug-E-Fresh1994 Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 haha not to be an ass or anything but as useual most people will skip the campaign all together, straight to MP. or at least the people i play with and alot of people iv talked to online say the never touched the single of mw2. so far not a single duty has a a story worth caring about IMO including the realish ones yawn to history. thats not to say im not going to play single i love trophies ill prob just skip storyline when i can and ignore what the npcs say. i never even knew there were moral choices in WaW you could let the soldies at subway entrance live is news to me i think... anyway maybe some1 should post a poll asking how many people actually listen to storyline of cod games. side not the crawling through tunnels part looked like might make ya jump a lil. To answer the poll. I do play one playthrough for action and 2-3 more to piece together the story All jmy friends ar still Playin MW2 online and show no sign of stiopping, I ALWAYS go online first. Its what cods about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurkki91 Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 Hmmm.. What can i say, W@W was my first Call of Duty and i treated it as i do with all games: Watched every cutscene. I'll do the same with Black Ops especially when it sounds so interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumper Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 i will play the campaign since i love ego shooters. First the offline part then the online Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vuule Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Why would you not play the Single Player.. Or atleast once? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kennus Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 said i always do play single go trophies w00t.. did you read the post? i just find the story's of nearly every shooter very dull and unable to hold my intrest. was just wondering if any1 else felt same about shooter storylines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornagandarub Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Doesn't matter to me what the game is, I will ALWAYS play the single player at least once and before I jump into online. Black Ops sounds terrific, and is part of the reason I like Treyarch more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
castlehominid99 Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 Yes people buy CoD for multiplayer not for a 5 hour story haha. The stories dont evfen make sense captain price clearly dies in CoD4 yet he comes back in MW2. So I guess Ghost and Roach r gonna come back somehow magically in MW3 haha. I really hope that Bungie gonna start making the games after MW3 because Infinity Ward is messed up they just care about the money and dont care if games r fun or not by one man army danger close noob tubes. Overpowered killstreaks which cause people to camp and commando along with many other things i dindt mention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now